How Old 4



Chapter 4 - Flaws in the Big Bang Theory!



Who Is The Father Of Lies?









Chapter 4 – Flaws with the Big Bang Theory!

Here we are once again going to use scientific data to show you
 
just how flawed the big bang theory truly is. In fact it is sooooo
 
flawed, it is actually quite silly to even consider.

 


I want all of you people to understand something. In the last 10
 
years with new scientific discoveries, with new scientific

equipment, the entire big bang theory has been completely
 
destroyed. It has been proven to be an ABSOLUTE

IMPOSSIBILTY NOW IN THE YEAR 2012!!

 


But you wont hear too much about this in the mainstream TV,
 
news, magazines, books and especially the schoolbooks.....

 

Why?

 

Well who owns the TV, news, magazines, books and the
 
textbooks?

 


The atheists and the evolutionists of course!!!




Remember, I am keeping every single scientific statement very
 
VERY short and simple on purpose.

 


*If there really was a big bang, matter would be distributed

evenly throughout the universe, But it is NOT! What we see are
 
clumps of matter clumped together in different regions of

space. You will see clumps of stars together, then great voids in
 
between them.

 


*Nobody has ever EVER seen a star form. Scientists have even
 
stated in their own science magazines that they do not have a
 
clue how even a single star has ever formed – Martin Harwit,

science magazine.







Crab Nebula






 


*The amount of water on Earth greatly exceeds that known on or within any other planet in the solar system. Liquid water, which is essential for life to survive, has unique and amazing properties; it covers 70% of Earth’s surface. Where did all Earth’s water come from?

 


If the Earth and solar system evolved from a swirling cloud of dust and gas, almost no water would reside near Earth’s present orbit. Any water (liquid or ice) that close to the Sun would vaporize and be blown by solar wind to the outer reaches of the solar system, as we see happening with water vapor in the tails of comets.

 






We can only conclude very correctly that GOD designed us our earth and all inhabitants on the earth to need water.




THEN GOD DESIGNED OUR DRINKING WATER!

 




Dr Walter Brown States →

 




 

THE MOLTEN EARTH LIE

 






Molten Earth?

For decades, textbooks have taught that the early Earth was molten for 500,000,000 years, because it formed by meteoritic bombardment. If so, the heat released by the impacts would have melted the entire Earth many times over. Had Earth ever been molten, dense, nonreactive chemical elements such as gold would have sunk to Earth’s core. Gold is 70% denser than lead, yet is found at the Earth’s surface. Therefore, the entire Earth was never molten and did not form by meteoritic bombardment.

 


 

THE EVOLVING PLANET LIE

 

Evolving Planets?

Contrary to popular opinion, planets should not form from just the mutual gravitational attraction of particles orbiting the Sun. Orbiting particles are much more likely to be scattered or expelled by their gravitational attraction than they are to be permanently pulled together. Experiments have shown that colliding particles almost always fragment rather than stick together. (Similar difficulties exist in trying to form a moon from particles orbiting a planet.)

 


Despite these problems, let us assume that pebble-size to moon-size particles somehow evolved. “Growing a planet” by many small collisions will produce an almost non-spinning planet, because spins imparted by impacts will be largely self-canceling.

 

The growth of a large, gaseous planet (such as Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, or Neptune) far from the central star is especially difficult for evolutionist astronomers to explain for several reasons.



a. Gases dissipate rapidly in the vacuum of outer space, especially the lightest two gases—hydrogen and helium, which comprise most of the mass of the giant planets.



 

b. Because gas molecules orbiting a star do not gravitationally pull in (or merge with) other gas molecules in the orbiting ring, a rocky planet, about ten or more times larger than Earth, must first form to attract all the gas gravitationally. This must happen very quickly, before the gas dissipates. (Jupiter’s hydrogen and helium are 300 times more massive than the entire Earth.)



 

c. Stars like our Sun—even those which evolutionists say are young—do not have enough orbiting hydrogen or helium to form one Jupiter.

 



Computer simulations show that Uranus and Neptune could not have evolved anywhere near their present locations. The planets that have been found outside our solar system also contradict the theories for how planets supposedly evolve.

 

 

 

 

THE PLANETARY RING LIE

 





 

Planetary Rings

Planetary rings have long been associated with claims that planets evolved. Supposedly, after planets formed from a swirling dust cloud, rings remained, as seen around the giant planets: Saturn, Uranus, Jupiter, and Neptune. Therefore, some believe that because we see rings, planets must have evolved




Actually, rings have nothing to do with a planet’s origin. Rings form when material is expelled from a moon by a volcano, a geyser, or the impact of a comet or meteorite. Debris that escapes a moon because of its weak gravity and a giant planet’s gigantic gravity then orbits that planet as a ring. If these rings were not periodically replenished, they would be dispersed in less than 10,000 years. Because a planet’s gravity pulls escaped particles away from its moons, particles orbiting a planet could never form moons—as evolutionists assert.

 


 

  Origin of the Moon

Evolutionary theories for the origin of the Moon are highly speculative and completely inadequate. The Moon could not have spun off from Earth, because its orbital plane is too highly inclined. Nor could it have formed from the same material as Earth, because the relative abundances of its elements are too dissimilar from those of Earth. The Moon’s nearly circular orbit is also strong evidence that it was never torn from nor captured by Earth. If the Moon formed from particles orbiting Earth, other particles should be easily visible inside the Moon’s orbit; none are.

 




Some claim that the Moon formed from debris splashed from Earth by a Mars-size impactor. If so, many small moons should have formed. The impactor’s glancing blow would either be too slight to form our large Moon, or so violent that Earth would end up spinning too fast. Besides, part of Earth’s surface and mantle would have melted, but none of the indicators of that melting have been found. Also, small particles splashed from Earth would have completely melted, allowing any water inside them to escape into the vacuum of space. However, Apollo astronauts found on the Moon tiny glass beads that had erupted as molten material from inside the Moon but had dissolved water inside! The total amount of water that was once inside the moon probably equaled that in the Caribbean Sea

 




But the Moon does exist. If it was not pulled or splashed from

Earth, was not built up from smaller particles near its present
 
orbit, and was not captured from outside its present orbit, only
 
one hypothesis remains:



The Moon was created in its present orbit.

 

Science proves our Sun did NOT evolve!



 

Faint Young Sun

If, as evolutionists teach, the solar system evolved from a spinning cloud of dust and gas 4.5 billion years ago, the slowly condensing Sun would have radiated 25–30% less heat during its first 600 million years than it radiates today. (A drop in the Sun’s radiation of only a few percent would freeze all our oceans.) Had this happened anytime in the past, let alone for 600 million years, the ice’s mirror-like surfaces would have reflected more of the Sun’s radiation into outer space, cooling Earth even more in a permanent, runaway deep-freeze. If it had, all agree that life could not have evolved.

 




Evolutionists first tried to solve this “faint young Sun” problem by assuming that Earth’s atmosphere once had up to a thousand times more heat-trapping carbon dioxide than today. No evidence supports this, and much opposes it. Actually, large amounts of carbon dioxide on a cool Earth would have produced “carbon dioxide ice clouds high in the atmosphere, reflecting the Sun’s radiation into outer space and locking Earth into a permanent ice age.”

 




A second approach assumes that Earth’s atmosphere had a thousand times more ammonia and methane, other heat-trapping gases. Unfortunately, sunlight quickly destroys both gases, and at high concentrations methane produces a haze that would have cooled Earth’s surface rather than warming it. Besides, ammonia would readily dissolve in water, making oceans toxic.

 




A third approach assumes that Earth had no continents, had much more carbon dioxide in its atmosphere, and rotated once every 14 hours, so most clouds were concentrated at the equator. With liquid water covering the entire Earth, more of the Sun’s radiation would be absorbed, raising Earth’s temperature slightly. All three assumptions are questionable.

 




Evolutionists have never explained in any of these approaches how such drastic changes could occur in almost perfect step with the slow increase in the Sun’s radiation. Until some evidence supports such “special pleadings,” it does not appear that the Sun evolved.

 




If the Sun, a typical and well-studied star, did not evolve, then why presume that all other stars did?

 

 

The Incredibly Flawed Big Bang Theory/Religion!

 

Big Bang?

The big bang theory, now known to be seriously flawed, was based on three observations: the redshift of light from distant stars, the cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation, and the amount of helium in the universe. All three have been poorly understood.

 



Redshift. The redshift of starlight is usually interpreted as a Doppler effect; that is, stars and galaxies are moving away from Earth, stretching out (or reddening) the wavelengths of light they emit. Space itself supposedly expands—so the total potential energy of stars, galaxies, and other matter increases today with no corresponding loss of energy elsewhere. Thus, the big bang violates the law of conservation of energy, probably the most important of all physical laws.

 




Conservation of energy is violated in another important way. If a big bang happened, distant galaxies should not just be receding from us, they should be decelerating. Measurements show the opposite; they are accelerating from us.





Helium. Contrary to what is commonly taught, the big bang theory does not explain the amount of helium in the universe; the theory was adjusted to fit the amount of helium. Ironically, the lack of helium in certain types of stars (B type stars) and the presence of beryllium and boron in “older” stars contradicts the big bang theory.

 




A big bang would produce only hydrogen, helium, and lithium, so the first generation of stars to somehow form after a big bang should consist only of those elements. Some of these stars should still exist, but despite extensive searches, none has been found.

 

Did you read that? NONE HAVE BEEN FOUND!!!!

 



The Great Carina Nebula Spans 300 Light Years Across!!

Praise JESUS!!



Interstellar Gas

Detailed analysis have long shown that neither stars nor planets could form from interstellar gas clouds. To do so, either by first forming dust particles or by direct gravitational collapse of the gas, would require vastly more time than the alleged age of the universe. An obvious alternative is that stars and planets were created.

 

 

 

 

Galaxies

Evolutionists now admit that galaxies cannot evolve from one type to another. There are also good reasons why natural processes cannot form galaxies. Furthermore, if spiral galaxies were billions of years old, their arms or bars would be severely twisted. Because they have maintained their shape, either galaxies are young, or unknown physical phenomena are occurring within galaxies. Even structures composed of galaxies are now known to be so amazingly large and so elongated that they could not have formed by slow gravitational attraction. Slow, natural processes cannot form such huge galactic structures; rapid, supernatural processes may have.

 



HOT VERY YOUNG PLANETS

 



 


Hot Planets

Jupiter, Saturn, and Neptune each radiate away more than twice the heat energy they receive from the Sun. Uranus and Venus also radiate too much heat. Calculations show that it is very unlikely that this energy comes from nuclear fusion, radioactive decay, gravitational contraction, or phase changes within those planets. This suggests that these planets have not existed long enough to cool off.

 






VERY YOUNG GALAXIES

 

Unstable Galaxies

Computer simulations of the motions of spiral galaxies show them to be highly unstable; they should completely change their shape in only a small fraction of the universe’s assumed evolutionary age. The simplest explanation for so many spiral galaxies, including our Milky Way Galaxy, is that they and the universe are much younger than has been assumed.

 



Star Formation. Astronomers recognize that the densest gas cloud seen in the universe today could not form stars by any known means, including gravitational collapse, unless that gas was once thousands of times more compact. Apparently, stars were formed before or as the heavens were stretched out.

 

 




 

VERY YOUNG COMETS

 

Young Comets

As comets pass near the Sun, some of their mass vaporizes, producing a long tail and other debris. Comets also fragment frequently or crash into the Sun or planets. Typical comets should disintegrate after several hundred orbits. For many comets this is less than 10,000 years. There is no evidence for a distant shell of cometary material surrounding the solar system, and there is no known way to add comets to the solar system at rates that even remotely balance their destruction. Actually, the gravity of planets tends to expel comets from the solar system rather than capture them. So, comets and the solar system appear to be less than 10,000 years old.

 


A VERY YOUNG SOLAR SYSTEM

Solar Wind

The Sun’s radiation applies an outward force on particles orbiting the Sun. Particles less than about one 100,000th of a centimeter in diameter should have been “blown out” of the solar system if it were billions of years old. Yet these particles are still orbiting the Sun. Conclusion: the solar system appears young.

 

NOTHING EVER CHANGES

 

Fruit Flies

A century of fruit fly experiments, involving 3,000 consecutive generations, gives absolutely no basis for believing that any natural or artificial process can cause an increase in complexity and viability. No clear genetic improvement has ever been observed in any form of life, despite the many unnatural efforts to increase mutation rates

 

 

OTHER BIG BANG PROBLEMS

 

Other Problems. If the big bang occurred, we should not see massive galaxies at such great distances, but such galaxies are seen. A big bang should not produce highly concentrated or rotating bodies. Galaxies are examples of both. Nor should a big bang produce tightly clustered galaxies. Also, a large volume of the universe should not be—but evidently is—moving sideways, almost perpendicular to the direction of apparent expansion. If a big bang occurred, equal amounts of matter and antimatter should have been made. For every charged particle in the universe, the big bang should have produced an identical particle but with the opposite electrical charge. (For example, the negatively charged electron’s antiparticle is the positively charged positron.) Only trivial amounts of antimatter have ever been detected, even in other galaxies.

 




If a big bang occurred, what caused the bang? Stars with enough mass become black holes, so not even light can escape their enormous gravity. How then could anything escape the trillions upon trillions of times greater gravity caused by concentrating all the universe’s mass in a “cosmic egg” that existed before a big bang? If the big bang theory is correct, one can calculate the age of the universe. This age turns out to be younger than objects in the universe whose ages were based on other evolutionary theories. Because this is logically impossible, one or both sets of theories must be incorrect. All these observations make it doubtful that a big bang occurred.







I am purposely trying to keep this book short and simple to read. I could of put in soooooooooooooooooooooooo much more scientific data in this chapter, but I will stop for now.

 


I pray that your spiritual eyes are starting to open, that your heart is starting to receive more and more the truth from GOD about these incredible deceptions.

 


The Big Bang deception has to be one of the very VERY largest satan has ever portrayed on planet earth.........




We have all fallen for it. At one time or another we all believed the universe was billions of years old. Come on, lets face it. Without the grace from GOD we would never ever learn the biblical truths that the entire creation is only 6000 years old.











Please Click Here to go to Chapter 5